Washington Faces Practical and Moral Dilemmas in Potential Fighter Jet Transfer
Recent suggestions that the impasse between the U.S. and Turkey over Ankara’s acquisition of the Russian S-400 missile system might soon be resolved have sparked renewed debate over the potential transfer of F-35 fighter jets to Turkey. However, both practical and moral concerns should give Washington pause before supporting such a move.
Practical Risks: Compromising the F-35’s Security
Granting Turkey access to the F-35 could inadvertently allow America’s adversaries to obtain critical information about the fighter jet, which could be exploited in future conflicts, endangering American and allied lives.
The F-35 boasts advanced capabilities and sensors, making it a crucial asset for American security. However, Turkey’s possession of both the S-400 and the F-35 poses a significant risk. Operating these systems in proximity or networked together would enable Moscow to gather valuable intelligence, potentially compromising the F-35’s effectiveness. This information could then be shared with other adversaries like Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang.
Moral Concerns: Turkey’s Support for Hamas
Beyond practical considerations, Turkey’s alignment with Hamas since the October 7 attacks raises serious moral questions. Arming a government that has openly sided with a designated terrorist organization with America’s premier fighter jet sends a dangerous message.
Despite being a former ally, Turkey, under Erdogan’s leadership, has strengthened ties with Hamas, providing political and financial support. Erdogan has even hosted senior Hamas figures and provided them with Turkish passports and safe haven.
Navigating the Legal Obstacles
Currently, Section 1245 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 prohibits the transfer of F-35s to Turkey unless certain conditions are met, including the removal of the S-400 system.
Erdogan’s advocates in Washington may attempt to circumvent this law through various means, such as seeking a cynical certification to Congress or lobbying for amendments that would weaken the restrictions.
A Storm of Lobbying on the Horizon
Anticipate a lobbying blitz from Erdogan’s supporters targeting key members of Congress, particularly those on the armed services and foreign relations committees.
Even Without the S-400, Trust Remains a Concern
Even if Turkey were to eliminate its S-400s, the Erdogan government’s character and actions should still preclude the transfer of F-35s.
Key Questions for Decision-Makers
Before considering the transfer of F-35s to Turkey, Washington should ask:
- Can we trust Erdogan to safeguard sensitive information related to the F-35?
- Should an ally of Hamas be armed with America’s most advanced fighter jet?
A thorough and honest evaluation of these questions leads to the conclusion that providing the Erdogan government with the F-35 would be a grave error.
